Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mm

Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mm

Viltrox
83 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
84 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Portrait
Viltrox
95
Sony
80
Video Cinema
Viltrox
92
Sony
77
Street
Viltrox
82
Sony
85
Professional
Viltrox
83
Sony
71
Travel
Viltrox
52
Sony
82
Budget
Viltrox
75
Sony
80
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
72
Sony
73
Landscape
Viltrox
63
Sony
68
Macro
Viltrox
63
Sony
61

Spezifikationen

Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mmSony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min13 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max13 mm50 mm
Elements149
Groups118
Aspherical Elements24
ED Elements41
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.4f/3.5
Min Aperture1.43.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.41 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMPZ
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance220 mm249 mm
Max Magnification0.1x0.215x

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mm

  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (82th percentile)82th %ile
  • Below average macro (26th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Fazit

Gleichstand

Both products are closely matched - Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mm wins 5 specs while Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm wins 4.

Viltrox 13mm f1.4 13mm Besser bei:

PortraitProfessionalVideo Cinema

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelLandscape