Sigma 750975

Sigma 750975

Sigma
40 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Sigma
31
Sony
94
Street
Sigma
39
Sony
91
Budget
Sigma
54
Sony
91
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
31
Sony
89
Video Cinema
Sigma
34
Sony
85
Landscape
Sigma
27
Sony
83
Portrait
Sigma
50
Sony
81
Professional
Sigma
28
Sony
81
Macro
Sigma
14
Sony
66

Spezifikationen

Sigma 750975Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min100 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max400 mm50 mm
Elements9
Groups8
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements1
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5
Min Aperturef/5-6.33.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony E
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight1.10 kg0.11 kg
Filter Thread41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm
Max Magnification0.215x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma 750975

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Preise

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is 789 € cheaper (4.6x less).

Sigma 7509750.039Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.411Score pro Dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS bietet 10.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen