Glynzak Wireless
Glynzak
68 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Behringer HPM1000
Behringer
23 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Gaming
Music
Studio
Work
Commute
Calls
Spezifikationen
| Glynzak Wireless | Behringer HPM1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.28 kg★ | 0.39 kg |
| Ear Cushion | PU artificial leather | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 80 dB | 105 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | Android Phone Control, Lightweight, Microphone Included, Volume Control, iOS Phone Control | Behringer HPM1000 Closed-Back Multi-Purpose Stereo Headphones, 5-Pack |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | — |
| Cable Length | — | 2 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 65 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Capacity | 500 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | iOS, Android | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Glynzak Wireless
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Behringer HPM1000
- Strong sound (77th percentile)
- Below average comfort (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average mic (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Preise
Glynzak Wireless
No current pricing available
Behringer HPM1000
Fazit
Gewinner: Glynzak Wireless
Scores 68 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 27 specs.
