Behringer HPM1000
Behringer
12 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Philips 6000 series H6509
Philips
73 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Budget
Work
Commute
Music
Calls
Studio
Spezifikationen
| Behringer HPM1000 | Philips 6000 series H6509 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | — | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.21 kg★ | 0.27 kg |
| Ear Cushion | — | memory foam |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Codecs | — | Philips H6509 Wireless Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones with Noise Canceling Pro - 70 Hours Play Time, Dynamic Bass, Clear Calls, Multipoint Connectivity, Black |
| Surround | — | Philips H6509 Wireless Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones with Noise Canceling Pro - 70 Hours Play Time, Dynamic Bass, Clear Calls, Multipoint Connectivity, Black | Philips H6509 Wireless Over-Ear Bluetoot |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | USB-C |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5 min for 3 hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| App | — | Philips Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Behringer HPM1000
- Below average connectivity (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average sound (24th percentile)
Philips 6000 series H6509
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong comfort (90th percentile)90th %ile
Preise
Behringer HPM10001.378Score pro Dollar
vs
Philips 6000 series H65092.240Score pro Dollar
Philips 6000 series H6509 bietet 1.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Philips 6000 series H6509
Scores 73 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 25 specs.
