Technics EAH-AZ80-A

Technics EAH-AZ80-A

Technics
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

Bose
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Technics
67
Bose
91
Gaming
Technics
70
Bose
83
Travel
Technics
63
Bose
81
Calls
Technics
75
Bose
79
Music
Technics
70
Bose
79
Commute
Technics
64
Bose
78
Fitness
Technics
40
Bose
78

Spezifikationen

Technics EAH-AZ80-ABose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsSmall, Medium, Large
Weight0.05 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACaptX Adaptive
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptiveadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesA2DP, HFP
Multipoint
Range9.100000381469727 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs6 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging20 Minutes for 2 Hours
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery24 hrs18 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count84
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppTechnics Audio ConnectBose app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

Technics EAH-AZ80-A

  • Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong anc (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong sound (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average battery (20th percentile)20th %ile

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 37 specs.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness