Gsangoo ME502-MF-02

Gsangoo ME502-MF-02

Gsangoo
39 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Gsangoo
33
TOZO
80
Budget
Gsangoo
53
TOZO
80
Travel
Gsangoo
25
TOZO
78
Fitness
Gsangoo
28
TOZO
72
Calls
Gsangoo
31
TOZO
70
Commute
Gsangoo
24
TOZO
70
Music
Gsangoo
24
TOZO
68

Spezifikationen

Gsangoo ME502-MF-02TOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsS/M/LMedium
Weight0.03 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingLightningUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingLightningUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

Gsangoo ME502-MF-02

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong mic (72nd percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average sound (32nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Preise

Gsangoo ME502-MF-02

TOZO Crystal Pods

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen