Penta Driver
22 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Apple
93 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Travel
Calls
Fitness
Gaming
Music
Spezifikationen
| Penta Driver | Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | ear-hook | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 8 pairs of silicone/foam ear tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.39 kg | 0.09 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | hybrid | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 5★ | 1 |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | 1MORE Penta Driver in-Ear Monitor Earphones, Hi-Res Certified Hybrid Multi-Driver HiFi Wired IEM Headphones, Detachable MMCX Connector, MEMS Mic and 3-in-1 Control, for Smartphones/PC/Tablet | AAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive Audio |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 24 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IP57 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Penta Driver
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average comfort (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average connectivity (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Fazit
Gewinner: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Scores 93 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 30 specs.