CoolJumper Q63-6
CoolJumper
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM
JBL
86 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Fitness
Travel
Calls
Gaming
Commute
Music
Spezifikationen
| CoolJumper Q63-6 | JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | ear-hook | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | S, M, L |
| Weight | — | 0.08 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 13 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 96 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | CoolJumper Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds 120H Playtime Bluetooth 5.3 Ear Buds for Sports, Hi-fi Stereo Earphones with LED Display Charging Case, Headphones for Running/Workout Audifonos inalambricos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | — | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 18 hrs★ | 12 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 Minutes for 4 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 36 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Capacity | — | 68 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX7 | IP55 |
Vor- & Nachteile
CoolJumper Q63-6
- Strong connectivity (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong anc (74th percentile)
- Strong mic (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average battery (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average build (35th percentile)
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Preise
CoolJumper Q63-61.066Score pro Dollar
vs
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM0.544Score pro Dollar
CoolJumper Q63-6 bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 37 specs.
