OKAMUS FN-OKAMUS

OKAMUS FN-OKAMUS

OKAMUS
53 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
95 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
OKAMUS
60
HP
91
Business
OKAMUS
51
HP
87
Creator
OKAMUS
55
HP
87
Developer
OKAMUS
55
HP
87
Home Office
OKAMUS
57
HP
87
Workstation
OKAMUS
57
HP
85
Ai Llm
OKAMUS
48
HP
67
Compact
OKAMUS
19
HP
31

Spezifikationen

OKAMUS FN-OKAMUSHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPUCore i7AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core ScoreKeine Daten
30,931
Cores8
Frequency4.0 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB
Graphics
GPU*590NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
9,280
28,703
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM8 GB12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM512 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 1512 GB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factortowermid-tower
PSU550W850W
Weight8.00 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports8
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWiFi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

OKAMUS FN-OKAMUS

  • Strong ram (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average port selection (21st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (25th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Preise

OKAMUS FN-OKAMUS

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen