Dell Pro Micro QCM1250 Black 2025

Dell Pro Micro QCM1250 Black 2025

Dell
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Dell
11
HP
91
Developer
Dell
57
HP
87
Creator
Dell
21
HP
87
Home Office
Dell
63
HP
87
Business
Dell
74
HP
87
Workstation
Dell
47
HP
86
Compact
Dell
77
HP
31
Ai Llm
Dell
22
HP
67

Spezifikationen

Dell Pro Micro QCM1250HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*Intel Core i5 14500TAMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
22,936
30,931
Cores148
Frequency1.7 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Intel UHD Graphics 770NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
1,534
28,703
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 1256 GB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU180W850W
Weight1.40 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports12
USB Ports108
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1x HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
BluetoothYesBluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

Dell Pro Micro QCM1250 Black 2025

  • Strong port selection (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong reliability (70th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average storage (21st percentile)
  • Below average gpu (33rd percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 11 of 26 specs.

Dell Pro Micro QCM1250 Besser bei:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation