Intel BX80768235

Intel BX80768235

Intel
87 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Efficiency
Intel
97
MICRO CENTER
65
Productivity
Intel
91
MICRO CENTER
74
Ai Llm
Intel
88
MICRO CENTER
56
Budget
Intel
87
MICRO CENTER
59
Gaming
Intel
78
MICRO CENTER
61
Server
Intel
78
MICRO CENTER
54

Spezifikationen

Intel BX80768235MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Processor
BrandIntel—
SeriesCore Ultra 5—
Model235—
CodenameArrow Lake—
Classdesktop—
Process3★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores14★—
P-cores6★—
E-cores8★—
Threads14★—
Base Clock
2,900
Keine Daten
Boost Clock
5,000
Keine Daten
Cache
L2 Cache26★—
L3 Cache24★—
Performance
PassMark Multi
36,426
70,111
PassMark Single
4,384
4,737
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★—
Max Speed
6,400
Keine Daten
Channels2★—
Max Memory
192
Keine Daten
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1851—
PCIe5.0—
PCIe Lanes24★—
TDP65★—
Max Turbo Power121★—
Unlocked✗—
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsIntel Graphics—
NPU TOPS3.5★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Intel BX80768235

  • Strong efficiency (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong platform (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong single thread (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong feature (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average affordability (35th percentile)

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average feature (21st percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Intel BX80768235

Scores 87 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 18 of 29 specs.

Intel BX80768235 Besser bei:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity