Kodak PIXPRO FZ45 Red

Kodak PIXPRO FZ45 Red

Kodak
16 Gesamtbewertung
vs
OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II Silver 2015

OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II Silver 2015

OM System
57 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Sports Wildlife
Kodak
5
OM System
55
Beginner
Kodak
18
OM System
53
Travel
Kodak
13
OM System
51
Wedding Events
Kodak
8
OM System
51
Photography
Kodak
6
OM System
48
Streaming
Kodak
22
OM System
47
Video
Kodak
18
OM System
47
Vlogging
Kodak
10
OM System
44
Youtube
Kodak
15
OM System
41
Product Photography
Kodak
15
OM System
38

Spezifikationen

Kodak PIXPRO FZ45OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II
Sensor
TypeCMOSMOS
Size1/2.3-inchmicro-four-thirds
Megapixels16.350000381469727 MP16 MP
ISO Range100100
Autofocus
AF Points981
Eye AF
Animal AF
Subject Detection
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)8.5 fps
Max Shutter1/20001/4
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution1080p1080p
1080p FPS30 fps
Log Profile
Display & EVF
Screen Size2.7"
Touchscreen
Articulating
EVF Resolution2.3M dots
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.12 kg0.39 kg
Battery Life120 shots
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBMicro-USB (USB 2.0)
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

Kodak PIXPRO FZ45 Red

  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Below average battery (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average build (2th percentile)2th %ile
  • Below average af (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average sensor (13th percentile)13th %ile

OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II Silver 2015

  • Strong user sentiment (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong evf (75th percentile)
  • Strong build (75th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (33th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II

Scores 57 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 6 of 25 specs.

OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography