OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro
OM System
25 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Minolta ProShot MN40Z Black
Minolta
24 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Beginner
Travel
Video
Product Photography
Streaming
Photography
Wedding Events
Youtube
Sports Wildlife
Vlogging
Spezifikationen
| OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro | Minolta ProShot MN40Z | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | BSI CMOS |
| Size | — | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | — | 20 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | — | 5★ |
| Eye AF | — | ✗ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 6 fps★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 1080p★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| Codec | — | H.264 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.14 kg★ | 0.43 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro
- Strong user sentiment (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong social proof (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Below average build (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average video (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average display (23th percentile)
Minolta ProShot MN40Z Black
- Strong stabilization (70th percentile)
- Below average af (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average video (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average build (21th percentile)
- Below average display (23th percentile)
Preise
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro0.070Score pro Dollar
vs
Minolta ProShot MN40Z Black0.031Score pro Dollar
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro bietet 2.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro
Scores 25 overall, wins 1 of 10 usage categories and 1 of 13 specs.
