SanDisk 8TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
90 综合评分
vs
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Samsung
74 综合评分
买家怎么说
SanDisk 8TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
92 满分 100 置信度中 18 条评价
用户对这款三星970 EVO M.2固态硬盘非常满意，称赞其速度、可靠性和安装简便。许多人指出相比SATA固态硬盘或机械硬盘有显著提升，启动和加载时间快。一些人提到价格较高，但认为性能值得。一些用户指出，除非使用三星魔术师软件，否则基准测试并不总是与宣传速度一致，而且热量在正常使用中不是问题。
优点
- 启动和加载速度快
- 性能可靠
- 安装简便
- 相比HDD/SATA固态硬盘显著提升
- 性能值得这个价格
缺点
- 价格偏高
- 基准测试可能不匹配宣传速度
- 高I/O任务下的发热问题
- 与某些笔记本电脑的兼容性问题
Performance 8
Value for money 6
Ease of installation 4
Compatibility 4
Heat management 3
Benchmark accuracy 2
评分
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
规格
| SanDisk 8TB SSD | Samsung 970 EVO Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 3 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | Samsung Phoenix |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓ | ✓ |
优缺点
SanDisk 8TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong random (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average capacity (26th percentile)
结论
胜出: SanDisk 8TB SSD
Scores 90 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.