Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
84 综合评分
vs
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm
Fujifilm
54 综合评分
买家怎么说
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
暂无用户反馈
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm
82 满分 100 置信度高 45 条评价
Fuji XF 56mm f/1.2 WR 因其出色的光学质量广受好评，能产生锐利、高对比度的图像和美丽的散景。许多用户认为它是理想的人像镜头，尽管有些人指出自动对焦并非最快，且并非所有版本都具备防尘防滴功能。少数评论提到了制造质量问题，如镜片内进灰，但总体评价非常积极。
优点
- 最大光圈下锐度非凡
- 美丽的散景和主体分离
- 坚固的全金属结构质量
缺点
- 部分版本无防尘防滴设计
- 自动对焦马达噪音可闻
- 光圈环容易被误碰
Image quality 18
Bokeh 14
Autofocus performance 10
Build quality 9
Weather sealing 6
Aperture ring 4
评分
Travel
Budget
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Macro
规格
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 56 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 56 mm |
| Elements | 19 | 13 |
| Groups | 15 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 2 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Coating | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | 4-6.3 | f/1.2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.57 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.28x★ | 0.14x |
优缺点
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong build (75th percentile)
- Strong optical (74th percentile)
- Below average macro (31st percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
价格
结论
胜出: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 84 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
