Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM
Viltrox TCL-X100VI 50mm
买家怎么说
Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM
佳能RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM镜头因其锐度、紧凑尺寸和出色的性价比而广受赞誉,尤其适用于R7和R50等APS-C相机上的风景和旅行摄影。用户欣赏其图像稳定和安静的自动对焦,但一些人指出,慢光圈限制了在弱光下不使用闪光灯或三脚架时的性能。少数人希望有更近的对焦距离,但总体而言,它被认为是一款多功能、轻便的广角变焦镜头,以其价格提供了令人印象深刻的效果。
优点
- 锐利的图像质量
- 紧凑轻巧的设计
- 出色的性价比
- 有效的图像稳定
- 安静流畅的自动对焦
缺点
- 最大光圈较慢(f/4.5-6.3)
- 无闪光灯时弱光性能有限
- 不附带遮光罩
- 不推荐用于全画幅相机
- 部分用户希望更近的对焦距离
Viltrox TCL-X100VI 50mm
Viltrox 50mm f/2 Air 被广泛称赞为比索尼和尼康更昂贵镜头更锐利、更轻便且价格实惠的替代品。用户一致强调其出色的图像质量、静音自动对焦以及价格下扎实的做工。少数人注意到在弱光下自动对焦较慢以及一些照度下降,但总体情绪极为积极。
优点
- 出色的锐度
- 轻巧紧凑
- 静音自动对焦
- 极佳的性价比
- 扎实的做工
缺点
- 弱光下自动对焦较慢
- 边缘照度下降
- 无防风雨密封
- 无手动光圈环
- 对焦速度略慢于索尼镜头
评分
规格
| Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM | Viltrox TCL-X100VI 50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 10 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 18 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 12 | 5 |
| Groups | 10 | 4 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 1 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| Coating | Super Spectra coating | multi-layer nano coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | 4.5-6.3 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.15 kg★ | 0.23 kg |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM | STM |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 140 mm | 50 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.23x★ | 0.11x |
优缺点
Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM
- Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
Viltrox TCL-X100VI 50mm
- Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
结论
Scores 73 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.