Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 综合评分
vs
Meike 85mm f/1.8 SE Mark II 85mm
Meike
55 综合评分
评分
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Street
Professional
Macro
Travel
Landscape
规格
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Meike 85mm f/1.8 SE Mark II 85mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 85 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 85 mm |
| Elements | — | 11 |
| Groups | — | 6 |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Layer Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | — | 0.37 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | STM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 850 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:7.7★ |
优缺点
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Meike 85mm f/1.8 SE Mark II 85mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong build (69th percentile)
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
价格
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
No current pricing available
Meike 85mm f/1.8 SE Mark II 85mm
结论
胜出: Meike 85mm f/1.8 SE Mark II 85mm
Scores 55 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 20 specs.
