7Artisans AF25mm F1.8 25mm
7Artisans
72 综合评分
vs
Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm
Nikon
83 综合评分
买家怎么说
7Artisans AF25mm F1.8 25mm
暂无用户反馈
Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm
82 满分 100 置信度中 15 条评价
尼康 55-200mm f/4-5.6 VR 翻新镜头普遍受到好评，许多用户称赞其性价比、安静的自动对焦和有效的减震功能。虽然有人指出它不是最锐利的镜头，并且存在一些小的做工问题，但大多数人认为它是休闲使用的绝佳预算友好型选择，尤其适合体育和音乐会。一些用户提到在最大变焦时自动对焦可能不太可靠，但总体满意度很高。
优点
- 出色的性价比
- 安静的自动对焦
- 有效的减震功能
- 紧凑轻便
- 清晰的图像质量
缺点
- 不是最锐利的镜头
- 最大变焦时自动对焦不可靠
- 塑料机身感觉廉价
- 翻新品缺少内部密封圈
- 高光圈影响弱光表现
Value for money 8
Autofocus performance 5
Image quality 6
Build quality 4
Vibration reduction 3
Refurbished condition 5
评分
Budget
Macro
Portrait
Street
Video Cinema
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
规格
| 7Artisans AF25mm F1.8 25mm | Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | standard | telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 25 mm | 55 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 25 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 7 | 13 |
| Groups | 5 | 9 |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | Multilayer Coating | Super Integrated Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 4-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 12★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Nikon F |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | — |
| Weight | 0.18 kg★ | 0.34 kg |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | Silent Wave Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 25 mm★ | 200 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:2 | 1:3.5 |
优缺点
7Artisans AF25mm F1.8 25mm
- Strong macro (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong aperture (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong macro (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
结论
胜出: Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm
Scores 83 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.