Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Canon
69 综合评分
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
暂无用户反馈
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
82 满分 100 置信度高 117 条评价
索尼E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS镜头被广泛称赞为APS-C E卡口相机出色的全能旅行和日常挂机镜头。用户一致强调其锐度、紧凑尺寸、轻巧重量以及多功能的27-200mm等效变焦范围。虽然有人指出在18mm端存在明显暗角以及弱光性能有限，但整体情绪非常积极，许多人认为它是套机镜头的绝佳升级。
优点
- 图像清晰锐利
- 紧凑轻巧
- 多功能的27-200mm等效变焦范围
- 有效的光学防抖
- 快速准确的自动对焦
缺点
- 18mm广角端有明显暗角
- 不适合弱光摄影
- 可变光圈限制了长焦端的亮度
- 部分个体可能存在品控问题
- 与高端镜头相比自动对焦略有延迟
Image quality 35
Build quality 12
Value for money 18
Vignetting 6
Low light performance 10
Zoom range 25
评分
Budget
Portrait
Travel
Street
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
Macro
规格
| Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 10 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 22 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 16 |
| Groups | 10 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| Coating | Super Spectra coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-4.5 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 6 | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-S | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.10 kg★ | 0.33 kg |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | USM | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 450 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.29x★ |
优缺点
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
结论
胜出: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.