HiFiMan Ananda
HiFiMan
42 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-A800
Technics
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
HiFiMan Ananda
88 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
HiFiMAN Ananda 因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，提供了巨大的声场、出色的细节还原以及温暖而快速的平板振膜声音特性。用户强调其在当前促销价格下的价值，尤其是与更昂贵的型号相比，并指出作为平板耳机，它相对容易驱动。然而，有些人认为它在休闲聆听时不如 Sennheiser HD6xx 那样令人放松，而且尽管做工有所改进，但在线材和塑料设计方面仍有一些小批评。总体而言，它被认为是用于批判性聆听和游戏的顶级耳机。
优点
- 卓越的音质和细节
- 巨大且身临其境的声场
- 促销价格下极佳的价值
- 对于平板耳机来说相对容易驱动
- 温暖而快速的平板声音特性
缺点
- 不如 Sennheiser HD6xx 放松
- 原装线材感觉脆弱且易损
- 塑料设计对于价格来说显得廉价
- 没有EQ时缺乏深沉的低音
- 明亮的高音可能会让一些人感到疲劳
Sound quality 7
Soundstage 5
Value for money 5
Build quality 5
Comfort 4
Cable quality 3
Technics EAH-A800
82 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Technics EAH-A800 耳机因其卓越的音质而获得压倒性的积极反馈，许多用户将其与有线耳机相媲美，尤其是在使用 LDAC 编解码器时。评论者称赞其佩戴舒适、主动降噪效果出色，以及能够营造出具有清晰立体声分离度的沉浸式声场。然而，少数用户报告了耐用性问题，例如头梁材料在一个月内松动以及一年后出现故障组件，而其他用户则建议进行小幅改进，例如更大的耳罩和更多的均衡器频段。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 佩戴舒适
- 沉浸式声场和立体声分离
- 支持 LDAC 编解码器，实现高品质音频
缺点
- 头梁材料的耐用性问题
- 一年后出现故障组件
- 耳罩可以稍大一些
- 头梁在头皮上感觉有点硬
- 只有 5 个均衡器频段（希望更多）
Sound quality 7
Build quality 2
Comfort 3
Anc performance 2
Ldac codec 3
Eq customization 2
评分
Gaming
Work
Calls
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
规格
| HiFiMan Ananda | Technics EAH-A800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | open | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.40 kg | 0.30 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | super-soft earpads |
| Headband | metal | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | planar magnetic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 8 Hz | 4 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 55 kHz★ | 40 kHz |
| Impedance | 27 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB | 105 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | HIFIMAN Ananda Over-Ear Full-Size Open-Back Planar Magnetic Headphones with Stealth Magnet, Comfortable Earpads, Detachable Cable for Home and Studio | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones with 2 Device Multipoint Connectivity - EAH-A800-K Black | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear | Technics | Black | Over Ear | Over E |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Dual Hybrid |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.5 m | 1 m |
| Range | — | 10.100000381469727 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 50 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 3 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 10 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri, Alexa |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | — | Technics Audio Connect |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
优缺点
HiFiMan Ananda
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Below average comfort (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average mic (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average anc (33rd percentile)
Technics EAH-A800
- Strong mic (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (95th percentile)95th %ile
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-A800
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 40 specs.