Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
86 综合评分
vs
Skullcandy Push Play S2PPW-S749
Skullcandy
53 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
Skullcandy Push Play S2PPW-S749
82 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
这款Skullcandy耳机因其牢固的贴合度、清晰的声音和出色的性价比而受到称赞。用户欣赏在锻炼或家务等活动中的舒适感，电池续航也被认为非常出色。然而，有些人希望音量能更大一些，低音能再强一点。总体而言，它们被认为是不错的购买选择，尤其是考虑到价格。
优点
- 活动期间牢固贴合
- 清晰纯净的声音
- 出色的电池续航
- 性价比极高
- 长时间佩戴舒适
缺点
- 音量不够大
- 低音/低频不足
Sound quality 4
Fit and comfort 4
Value for money 4
Battery life 2
Volume level 2
Bass performance 2
评分
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Travel
Budget
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ80 | Skullcandy Push Play S2PPW-S749 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L, XL | 3 sizes |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.10 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 22 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LDAC, SBC | Skullcandy Push Play Active Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth Headphones, Noise Isolating Fit, 34 Hrs Battery, Secure-Fit Over-Ear Hanger, Sweat Water Resistant, Microphone for iPhone Android - Black/Orange |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 7 hrs | 10 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours | 2 horas de reproducción en solo 10 minutos |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 16 hrs | 34 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Capacity | 85 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 8★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Technics Audio Connect | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IP55 |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
Skullcandy Push Play S2PPW-S749
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong battery (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Strong comfort (70th percentile)
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ800.003每美元得分
vs
Skullcandy Push Play S2PPW-S7490.011每美元得分
Skullcandy Push Play S2PPW-S749 性价比高 3.7 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 36 specs.
