Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
Etymotic Research ER3SE
Etymotic Research
28 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其出色的音质（尤其是使用 LDAC 和杜比全景声时）而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户强调其基于 AI 的通话降噪功能出奇地有效，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。通过应用程序实现的舒适性和自定义功能也受到称赞，尽管有些人指出其主动降噪比之前的 AZ80 型号稍弱。
优点
- 使用 LDAC 的出色音质
- AI 通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适
- 通过应用程序自定义均衡器
- 有效的主动降噪和通透模式
缺点
- 价格较高（300美元）
- 主动降噪比 AZ80 稍弱
- 触控需要适应
Sound quality 8
Call quality 3
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
Etymotic Research ER3SE
88 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
Etymotic ER3 SE 因其中性、无染色的声音和卓越的被动隔音效果而广受赞誉，常被描述为价格上无可匹敌。用户强调需要深插入和合适的耳塞套才能获得舒适和最佳音质，而线材的麦克风效应是常见的痛点。XR 版本则收到褒贬不一的反馈，有些人认为它比 SE 更浑浊。总的来说，这些入耳式耳机是追求清晰度和隔音效果（无需主动降噪）的发烧友的顶级选择。
优点
- 中性无染色的声音
- 卓越的被动隔音效果
- 出色的性价比
- 可更换线材
- 使用合适的耳塞套舒适
缺点
- 明显的线材麦克风效应
- 附带的耳塞套不舒适
- 需要深插入
- 没有线控麦克风或控制键
- 不适合侧睡
Sound quality 7
Noise isolation 5
Cable quality 5
Comfort and fit 6
Value for money 4
Build quality 3
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100-N | Etymotic Research ER3SE | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | in-ear |
| Ear Tips | Extra large, Large, Medium, Small | Assorted |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | balanced armature |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 16 kHz |
| Impedance | — | 22 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | Etymotic ER3SE Studio Edition Earphone,Black |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Etymotic Research ER3SE
- Strong user sentiment (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average sound (29th percentile)
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ100-N0.002每美元得分
vs
Etymotic Research ER3SE0.001每美元得分
Technics EAH-AZ100-N 性价比高 2.0 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 39 specs.
