Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 综合评分
vs
Redzeo 52161554

Redzeo 52161554

Redzeo
42 综合评分

买家怎么说

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价

Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉,用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞,尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题,但总体情绪非常积极。

优点
  • 卓越的音质
  • 深沉沉浸式低音
  • 有效的降噪功能
  • 舒适的佩戴感
  • 出色的电池续航
缺点
  • 价格较高
  • 最大音量有限
  • 蓝牙 LE 断开
  • 多设备配对问题
  • 塑料外壳
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

Redzeo 52161554

72 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价

这些无线耳机因其出色的性价比、带耳挂的稳固贴合以及令人印象深刻的电池续航而备受赞誉,非常适合锻炼和日常使用。然而,许多用户报告了反复出现的质量问题,如随机跳歌、音量变化和充电端口脆弱,有些甚至在几个月内完全失效。音质和麦克风性能的评价褒贬不一,但总体而言,考虑到价格,用户情绪是积极的,尽管可靠性问题值得关注。

优点
  • 出色的性价比
  • 耳挂设计稳固贴合
  • 电池续航长
  • 非常适合锻炼
  • 低音表现良好
缺点
  • 充电端口脆弱
  • 随机跳歌和音量变化
  • 耐用性随时间不一致
  • Micro-USB而非USB-C
  • 麦克风质量一般
👍 Value for money 5
👎 Build quality 6
👍 Battery life 4
🤔 Sound quality 5
👍 Fit and comfort 4
👎 Charging port 3

评分

Budget
Technics
99
Redzeo
54
Travel
Technics
95
Redzeo
26
Calls
Technics
93
Redzeo
34
Commute
Technics
90
Redzeo
25
Music
Technics
90
Redzeo
40
Gaming
Technics
88
Redzeo
45
Fitness
Technics
80
Redzeo
30

规格

Technics EAH-AZ100Redzeo 52161554
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessear-hook, in-ear
Ear Tips5 x Eartip PairsXS, S, M, L
Weight0.05 kg★0.11 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm11 mm★
Drivers1★—
Freq Min20 Hz★—
Freq Max40 kHz★—
Impedance16 Ω—
Hi-Res Audio✓★—
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBCSBC, AAC
SurroundDolby Atmos—
Noise Control
ANC✓★—
ANC Typeadaptive—
Transparency✓★—
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.3★5.0
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP—
Multipoint✓✓
Wired ConnectorBluetooth—
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs16 hrs★
Charge Time2.5 hrs2 hrs★
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback—
ChargingUSB-C★—
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs★—
Case ChargingUSB-C★—
Wireless Charging✓★—
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count6★—
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Touch Controls✓★—
AppAndroid & iOS—
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗—
Bone Conduction✗—
Water ResistanceIPX4IPX7

优缺点

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Redzeo 52161554

  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong sound (78th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Strong mic (67th percentile)
  • Below average battery (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (33rd percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

价格

Redzeo 52161554 is ₹44,067 cheaper (11.6x less).

Technics EAH-AZ1000.002每美元得分
vs
Redzeo 521615540.010每美元得分

Redzeo 52161554 性价比高 5.0 倍

Technics EAH-AZ100

Redzeo 52161554

结论

★ 胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 更擅长:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

也值得考虑