Xmenha RM
Xmenha
40 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
Xmenha RM
72 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
这些耳机以两副套装形式提供，一副较大一副迷你，许多用户赞赏其多功能性。迷你耳机因舒适而受到称赞，尤其适合睡觉或小耳朵，而较大的耳机常被批评为不舒适。音质被描述为价格合理但偶尔有金属感，电池续航评价不一——有些人认为极好，另一些人则报告续航短且低电量警告声非常刺耳。连接性有时不稳定，偶尔出现配对问题，但总体而言，该产品被认为对于隐蔽、低成本使用具有良好性价比。
优点
- 包含两副耳机，用途多样
- 迷你耳机适合睡觉时佩戴
- 性价比高
- 充电快
- 隐蔽低调的设计
缺点
- 较大的耳机对某些人不舒适
- 电池续航不一致
- 低电量警告声非常刺耳
- 音质可能带有金属感
- 配对连接问题
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Sound quality 5
Value for money 4
Connectivity 3
Design and discreetness 3
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Xmenha RM | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | — | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Xmenha Flat Sleep Mini Invisible Small Tiny Earbuds Wireless Bluetooth Ear Buds for Sleeping Headphones Micro Smallest Discreet Sleep Earbuds Earphones for Side Sleepers, Small Ears Canals Women, Work | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 3.5 hrs | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 72 hrs★ | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | IPX4 |
优缺点
Xmenha RM
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong anc (73rd percentile)
- Strong mic (67th percentile)
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average sound (29th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (33rd percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
Xmenha RM0.010每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.002每美元得分
Xmenha RM 性价比高 5.0 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.
