Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
be quiet!
40 综合评分
vs
AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+
AMD
42 综合评分
买家怎么说
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
暂无用户反馈
AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+
72 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
AMD FX-8300 通常因其性价比和在游戏及多任务处理中的性能而受到好评，用户称赞其超频潜力和与 DDR3 内存的兼容性。然而，一些评论指出原装散热器噪音大且效率低，建议更换第三方散热器。关于 L3 缓存规格也存在一些困惑，尽管一位用户确认它有 8MB。总体而言，这是一款可靠的预算 CPU，但潜在买家应考虑等待更新的选项，如 Ryzen。
优点
- 性价比高
- 超频潜力强
- 兼容 DDR3 内存
- 游戏性能良好
- 中等超频下稳定
缺点
- 原装散热器噪音大
- 原装散热器效率低
- L3 缓存规格混乱
- 相比 FX-6350 提升不大
- 可能需要更新 BIOS
Stock cooler 3
Overclocking potential 3
Value for money 2
Ram compatibility 3
Gaming performance 2
L3 cache spec 2
评分
Productivity
Budget
Gaming
Efficiency
Ai Llm
Server
规格
| Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 | AMD FX 8300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Ryzen 3 | FX |
| Model | 1200 | FD8300WMHKBOX |
| Codename | Zen | Vishera |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 14★ | 32 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 4 | 8★ |
| P-cores | 4★ | — |
| Threads | 4 | 8★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 2 | 8★ |
| L3 Cache | 8 | 8 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4★ | DDR3 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM4 | AM3+ |
| PCIe | 3.0 | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16★ | — |
| TDP | 270 | 95★ |
| Unlocked | ✓ | ✓ |
优缺点
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average efficiency (33rd percentile)
AMD FX 8300 8-core AM3+
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
- Below average single thread (34th percentile)
结论
平局
Both products are closely matched - Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 wins 8 specs while AMD FX 8300 wins 7.