fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1
26 综合评分
vs
Intel Core i3 10100F 4-core LGA 1200

Intel Core i3 10100F 4-core LGA 1200

Intel
60 综合评分

买家怎么说

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

暂无用户反馈

Intel Core i3 10100F 4-core LGA 1200

72 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价

Intel Core i3-10100F 在预算型装机中普遍受到好评,为日常任务和轻度游戏提供稳定性能。用户欣赏其与 LGA 1200 主板和 Windows 11 的兼容性,但有人指出不附带导热膏且需要单独购买散热器。总体而言,它被认为是入门级计算的不错选择。

优点
  • LGA 1200 兼容性
  • 支持 Windows 11
  • 适合轻度游戏
  • 多任务性能稳定
  • 性价比高
缺点
  • 不附带导热膏
  • 可能需要散热器
  • 无集成显卡
  • 超频潜力有限
👍 Socket compatibility 3
👍 Windows 11 support 2
👍 Gaming performance 2
🤔 Cooling solution 2
👎 Thermal paste inclusion 1
🤔 Overclocking capability 1

评分

Budget
fosa1
28
Intel
67
Efficiency
fosa1
24
Intel
64
Productivity
fosa1
26
Intel
63
Gaming
fosa1
25
Intel
62
Ai Llm
fosa1
23
Intel
50
Server
fosa1
23
Intel
49

规格

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izudIntel Core i3 10100F
Processor
BrandIntelIntel
Series—Core i3
ModelX565010100F
Codename—Comet Lake
Classdesktopdesktop
Process—14★
Cores & Clocks
Cores6★4
Threads12★8
Base Clock
2,660
3,600
Boost Clock
3,060
4,300
Cache
L2 Cache—1★
L3 Cache12★6
Performance
PassMark Multi无数据
8,705
PassMark Single无数据
2,579
Memory
Memory TypeDDR3DDR4★
Max Speed
1,333
2,666
Channels3★2
Max Memory
288
128
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1366LGA 1200
PCIe—3.0
PCIe Lanes—16★
TDP9565★
Max Turbo Power—134★
Unlocked—✓★
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—None Integrated Graphics

优缺点

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

  • Strong platform (65th percentile)
  • Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (25th percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (25th percentile)
  • Below average ai (26th percentile)

Intel Core i3 10100F 4-core LGA 1200

  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong single thread (73rd percentile)
  • Strong platform (69th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

结论

★ 胜出: Intel Core i3 10100F

Scores 60 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

Intel Core i3 10100F 更擅长:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity