IRIS IRISPen 463573

IRIS IRISPen 463573

IRIS
9 综合评分
vs
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core LGA1851

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core LGA1851

Intel
95 综合评分

买家怎么说

IRIS IRISPen 463573

暂无用户反馈

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core LGA1851

88 满分 100 置信度中 14 条评价

从旧款英特尔芯片(如8700K或8600K)升级的用户报告称,在游戏和生产力方面有巨大提升,其中一人平均帧数增加了20帧。该CPU运行凉爽,尤其在打折时被认为物超所值。有人提到对于拥有近期英特尔代的用户来说不值得升级,还有用户警告安装时要小心,以免弯曲针脚。

优点
  • 从旧芯片升级性能提升巨大
  • 运行凉爽
  • 打折时物超所值
  • 游戏和生产力表现出色
  • 新BIOS更新后稳定
缺点
  • 从近期英特尔升级不值得
  • 安装时有弯曲针脚的风险
  • 需要新主板、内存、散热器
👍 Performance boost from old chips 4
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Thermal performance 2
🤔 Upgrade worthiness 3
👎 Installation difficulty 1
👍 Gaming performance 3

评分

Productivity
IRIS
7
Intel
97
Ai Llm
IRIS
4
Intel
92
Budget
IRIS
28
Intel
92
Gaming
IRIS
7
Intel
88
Efficiency
IRIS
6
Intel
84
Server
IRIS
5
Intel
77

规格

IRIS IRISPen 463573Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Processor
Brand—Intel
Series—Core Ultra 7
Model—265KF
Codename—Arrow Lake-S
Class—desktop
Process—3★
Cores & Clocks
Cores—20★
P-cores—8★
E-cores—12★
Threads—20★
Base Clock无数据
3,900
Boost Clock无数据
5,500
Cache
L2 Cache—36★
L3 Cache—30★
Performance
PassMark Multi无数据
58,410
PassMark Single无数据
4,922
Memory
Memory Type—DDR5★
Max Speed无数据
6,400
Channels—2★
Max Memory无数据
192
ECC—✗
Platform & Power
Socket—LGA1851
PCIe—5.0
PCIe Lanes—24★
TDP—125★
Max Turbo Power—250★
Unlocked—✓★
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—None
NPU TOPS—13★

优缺点

IRIS IRISPen 463573

  • Strong affordability (73rd percentile)
  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core LGA1851

  • Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile

结论

★ 胜出: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 20 of 29 specs.

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 更擅长:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity