iClever Kids
iClever
36 Pontuação geral
vs
JBL Junior Junior 320BT
JBL
56 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Budget
Gaming
Music
Work
Commute
Calls
Studio
Especificações
| iClever Kids | JBL Junior Junior 320BT | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.15 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm★ | 30 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 36 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 80 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 81 dB★ |
| Codecs | iClever Kids Headphones with Cord, 85dBA Safe Volume Wired Headphones for Kids, Stereo Sound Foldable Adjustable, 3.5mm Jack, Over Ear Child Headphone for School/Boys/Girls/iPad/Tablet/Travel | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 50 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5 Minutes for 3 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 500 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 1★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Volume Limiting | ✓ | ✓ |
Prós e Contras
iClever Kids
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
JBL Junior Junior 320BT
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong battery (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong connectivity (73th percentile)
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Preços
iClever Kids0.007pontos por dólar
vs
JBL Junior Junior 320BT0.005pontos por dólar
iClever Kids oferece 1.4x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: JBL Junior Junior 320BT
Scores 56 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 29 specs.
