Team Group FF9D548G8000HC38EDC01
Team Group
87 종합 점수
vs
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B
Crucial
86 종합 점수
점수
Server
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
사양
| Team Group FF9D548G8000HC38EDC01 | Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 38 | 38 |
| Timings | — | 38-40-40-84 |
| Voltage | — | 1.350000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Team Group FF9D548G8000HC38EDC01
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong latency (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong capacity (85th percentile)85th %ile
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (77th percentile)
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
가격
Team Group FF9D548G8000HC38EDC010.001달러당 점수
vs
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B0.002달러당 점수
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Team Group FF9D548G8000HC38EDC01
Scores 87 overall, wins 3 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 15 specs.
