Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
Vivitar
37 종합 점수
vs
Ulanzi 2229
Ulanzi
64 종합 점수
점수
Macro
Portrait
Budget
Street
Professional
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
사양
| Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm | Ulanzi 2229 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 55 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 55 mm | 18 mm |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | 30-Layer Nano-Coating Double-Side |
| Build | ||
| Mount | 55mm | sony |
| Weight | 0.14 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 55 mm | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 18 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 10X★ |
장단점
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong aperture (70th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (69th percentile)
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
Ulanzi 2229
- Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (70th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (69th percentile)
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
가격
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm0.013달러당 점수
vs
Ulanzi 22290.005달러당 점수
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm 2.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Ulanzi 2229
Scores 64 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 11 specs.
