Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
86 종합 점수
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 종합 점수

점수

Macro
Canon
95
Sigma
100
Landscape
Canon
79
Sigma
100
Budget
Canon
79
Sigma
99
Travel
Canon
78
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Canon
82
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Canon
75
Sigma
87
Portrait
Canon
49
Sigma
85
Professional
Canon
77
Sigma
84
Street
Canon
66
Sigma
80

사양

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm300 mm
Elements1520
Groups1214
Aspherical Elements24★
ED Elements25★
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.49 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★HLA
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance239 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification1:4.21:2

장단점

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

결론

★ 승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports