Sigma Contemporary 56mm f/1.4 DC DN 56mm

Sigma Contemporary 56mm f/1.4 DC DN 56mm

Sigma
76 종합 점수
vs
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
80 종합 점수

점수

Street
Sigma
94
Canon
64
Portrait
Sigma
91
Canon
54
Professional
Sigma
90
Canon
80
Landscape
Sigma
60
Canon
89
Video Cinema
Sigma
81
Canon
75
Budget
Sigma
72
Canon
80
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
74
Canon
79
Travel
Sigma
69
Canon
73
Macro
Sigma
64
Canon
65

사양

Sigma Contemporary 56mm f/1.4 DC DN 56mmCanon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min56 mm15 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm35 mm
Elements1016
Groups612
Aspherical Elements23
ED Elements12
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingAir-Sphere coating, Fluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.4f/22
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon Z, Nikon Z, Nikon Z, Nikon Z, Nikon ZCanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.07 kg0.84 kg
Filter Thread55 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm280 mm
Max Magnification1:7.140.21x

장단점

Sigma Contemporary 56mm f/1.4 DC DN 56mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

결론

승자: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Scores 80 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 56mm f/1.4 DC DN 56mm 더 나은 점:

StreetPortraitProfessionalVideo Cinema

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 더 나은 점:

BudgetTravelLandscapeWildlife Sports