Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
82 종합 점수
vs
JLab IEUHBJLUXANCRSGE62

JLab IEUHBJLUXANCRSGE62

JLab
15 종합 점수

점수

Budget
Beyerdynamic
86
JLab
24
Commute
Beyerdynamic
84
JLab
15
Gaming
Beyerdynamic
82
JLab
14
Music
Beyerdynamic
82
JLab
18
Work
Beyerdynamic
80
JLab
12
Studio
Beyerdynamic
78
JLab
15
Calls
Beyerdynamic
69
JLab
9

사양

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609JLab IEUHBJLUXANCRSGE62
Design
Form Factoron-ear
Open/Closedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.22 kg0.12 kg
Ear Cushionreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size45 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max22 kHz
Impedance48 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
ProfilesAVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life40 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 Minutes for 15 Hours
ChargingUSB-C
Capacity630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
Appbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

장단점

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

JLab IEUHBJLUXANCRSGE62

  • Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average sound (24th percentile)

결론

승자: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 39 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 더 나은 점:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute