AMD AD9800AHABBOX
AMD
37 종합 점수
vs
SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5
SMC
80 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Gaming
Budget
Efficiency
사양
| AMD AD9800AHABBOX | SMC EPYC 9555P | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Series | AMD A Series | EPYC |
| Model | A12-9800E | 9555P |
| Codename | Bristol Ridge | Turin |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 4★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 4 | 64★ |
| P-cores | — | 64★ |
| Threads | 데이터 없음 | |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 2 | 64★ |
| L3 Cache | ||
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM4 | AMD Socket SP5 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 데이터 없음 | |
| TDP | — | 360★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 400★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 Graphics | — |
장단점
AMD AD9800AHABBOX
- Strong user sentiment (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average efficiency (23rd percentile)
- Below average ai (27th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (30th percentile)
SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5
- Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong platform (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong efficiency (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average affordability (0th percentile)0th %ile
결론
승자: SMC EPYC 9555P
Scores 80 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 25 specs.