Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
Intel
45 종합 점수
vs
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Productivity
Efficiency
Server
Ai Llm
사양
| Intel Celeron G5900 | Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Celeron | — |
| Model | G5900 | 000 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | — |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 14★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 2★ | — |
| P-cores | 4★ | — |
| Threads | 2★ | — |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 1★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 2★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4★ | — |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16★ | — |
| TDP | 58★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | — |
장단점
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
- Strong single thread (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong platform (75th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (24th percentile)
- Below average ai (24th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (27th percentile)
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
가격
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 12000.008달러당 점수
vs
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM50.017달러당 점수
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5 2.1배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Celeron G5900
Scores 45 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 25 specs.
