Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Panasonic
64 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Budget
Panasonic
66
Canon
97
Portrait
Panasonic
73
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Panasonic
71
Canon
90
Professional
Panasonic
82
Canon
75
Street
Panasonic
73
Canon
82
Travel
Panasonic
63
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
73
Canon
77
Landscape
Panasonic
61
Canon
76
Macro
Panasonic
54
Canon
68

Specifiche

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm135 mm
Elements1216
Groups912
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements11
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountL-MountCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.50 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typedouble-magnet linear motorSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm390 mm
Max Magnification0.23x0.28x

Pro e Contro

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong build (72nd percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Verdetto

Vincitore: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm Migliore per:

Professional

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports