Skullcandy Rail S2RLW-Q751
Skullcandy
51 Score global
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Score global
Ce que disent les acheteurs
Skullcandy Rail S2RLW-Q751
Pas encore de retours clients
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 sur 100 confiance moyenne 28 avis
Les écouteurs Technics EAH-AZ100 sont largement salués pour leur qualité sonore exceptionnelle, avec des basses profondes, des aigus clairs et un son immersif. Le confort, l'autonomie et la réduction de bruit sont également souvent loués, bien que certains utilisateurs trouvent le prix élevé et le volume insuffisant. Quelques problèmes mineurs comme les déconnexions Bluetooth LE et l'appairage multi-appareils ont été mentionnés, mais le sentiment général est très positif.
Points forts
- Qualité sonore exceptionnelle
- Basses profondes et immersives
- Réduction de bruit efficace
- Confortable à porter
- Excellente autonomie
Points faibles
- Prix élevé
- Volume maximal limité
- Déconnexions Bluetooth LE
- Problèmes d'appairage multi-appareils
- Extérieur en plastique
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Scores
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
Spécifications
| Skullcandy Rail S2RLW-Q751 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | Small, Medium, Large | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.05 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 6 mm | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Max SPL | 100 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Skullcandy Rail Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth Headphones, Noise Isolating Fit, Up to 42 Hours Battery, IP55 Sweat and Water Resistant, Microphone for iPhone Android - Bone | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 42 hrs★ | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | Schnellladung | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 42 hrs★ | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Skull-IQ | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | IPX4 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Skullcandy Rail S2RLW-Q751
- Strong battery (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Below average sound (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Prix
Skullcandy Rail S2RLW-Q7510.009score par dollar
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.002score par dollar
Skullcandy Rail S2RLW-Q751 offre un rapport qualité-prix 4.5x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 41 specs.
