Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Inland
52 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 540 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 540 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
79 Overall Score

Scores

Laptop
Inland
50
Seagate
78
Workstation
Inland
54
Seagate
76
Gaming
Inland
39
Seagate
75
Console
Inland
18
Seagate
71
Budget
Inland
42
Seagate
64
Portable
Inland
11
Seagate
19

Specifications

Inland TN320Seagate FireCuda 540
Drive
Capacity
256
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation35★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
2,000
9,500
Sequential Write (MB/s)
1,600
8,500
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,500,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache—✗
Controller—E26
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
1,200
2,000
MTBF (hours)
2,000,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)6★5
Features
Heatsink—✗

Pros & Cons

Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile

Seagate FireCuda 540 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong feature (71st percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Seagate FireCuda 540

Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.

Seagate FireCuda 540 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation