Samyang 100mm f/2.8 ED UMC Macro 100mm

Samyang 100mm f/2.8 ED UMC Macro 100mm

Samyang
28 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Samyang
58
Sigma
100
Landscape
Samyang
32
Sigma
100
Budget
Samyang
26
Sigma
99
Travel
Samyang
22
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Samyang
24
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Samyang
21
Sigma
87
Portrait
Samyang
19
Sigma
85
Professional
Samyang
29
Sigma
84
Street
Samyang
23
Sigma
80

Specifications

Samyang 100mm f/2.8 ED UMC Macro 100mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min100 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max100 mm300 mm
Elements1520
Groups1214
Aspherical Elements14★
ED Elements15★
CoatingUltra Multi-Coatingwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.73 kg0.61 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyHLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance307 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification1:11:2

Pros & Cons

Samyang 100mm f/2.8 ED UMC Macro 100mm

  • Strong optical (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong macro (69th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports