Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm

Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm

Sony
55 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sony
47
Sigma
100
Landscape
Sony
57
Sigma
100
Budget
Sony
53
Sigma
99
Travel
Sony
59
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Sony
47
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Sony
48
Sigma
87
Portrait
Sony
39
Sigma
85
Professional
Sony
55
Sigma
84
Street
Sony
55
Sigma
80

Specifications

Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements720
Groups514
Aspherical Elements34★
ED Elements15★
CoatingZEISS T* Anti-Reflective Coatingwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.83.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.12 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread49 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusHLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops4 stops6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification0.24x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports