Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

Rokinon
63 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
98
Rokinon
62
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
Rokinon
44
Travel
Nikon
92
Rokinon
48
Landscape
Nikon
88
Rokinon
49
Professional
Nikon
83
Rokinon
68
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Rokinon
63
Street
Nikon
81
Rokinon
64
Portrait
Nikon
78
Rokinon
76
Macro
Nikon
74
Rokinon
63

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRRokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min24 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm50 mm
Elements199
Groups156
Aspherical Elements22
ED Elements11
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal CoatingsUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/1.4
Min Aperture4-6.3f/1.4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades78★
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.57 kg0.42 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm450 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x1:6.25★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

  • Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (65th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports