Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

Leica
26 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
98
Leica
24
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
Leica
19
Travel
Nikon
92
Leica
13
Landscape
Nikon
88
Leica
18
Professional
Nikon
83
Leica
33
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Leica
32
Street
Nikon
81
Leica
30
Portrait
Nikon
78
Leica
49
Macro
Nikon
71
Leica
28

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRLeica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min24 mm180 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm180 mm
Elements199
Groups157
Aspherical Elements2★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/3.5
Min Aperture4-6.3f/3.5
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountNikon ZLeica S
Formatfull-frame★medium-format
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.57 kg★1.15 kg
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motor★Automatic/manual
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm★1.52 m
Max Magnification0.28x★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average build (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports