Sigma 2.0x APO Tele Converter

Sigma 2.0x APO Tele Converter

Sigma
39 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
44
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
31
Nikon
94
Travel
Sigma
26
Nikon
92
Landscape
Sigma
21
Nikon
88
Professional
Sigma
32
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
37
Nikon
82
Street
Sigma
45
Nikon
81
Portrait
Sigma
50
Nikon
78
Macro
Sigma
19
Nikon
74

Specifications

Sigma 2.0x APO Tele ConverterNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min—24 mm
Focal Length Max—200 mm
Elements—19
Groups—15
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—1★
Coating—ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/4
Min Aperture—4-6.3
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountMinoltaNikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.40 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto Focusstepping motor★
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—500 mm★
Max Magnification—0.28x★

Pros & Cons

Sigma 2.0x APO Tele Converter

  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports