Meike 6.5mm f/2.0 Circular Fisheye 7mm

Meike 6.5mm f/2.0 Circular Fisheye 7mm

Meike
38 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Meike
51
Sigma
100
Landscape
Meike
33
Sigma
100
Budget
Meike
29
Sigma
99
Travel
Meike
33
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Meike
22
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Meike
25
Sigma
87
Portrait
Meike
23
Sigma
85
Professional
Meike
30
Sigma
84
Street
Meike
28
Sigma
80

Specifications

Meike 6.5mm f/2.0 Circular Fisheye 7mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typefisheyezoom
Focal Length Min6 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max6 mm300 mm
Elements620
Groups514
Aspherical Elements14★
ED Elements—5★
CoatingMulti-Layer Nano Coatingwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/23.5-6.7
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.30 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyHLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance220 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

Meike 6.5mm f/2.0 Circular Fisheye 7mm

  • Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports