Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

Tamron
44 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
99
Tamron
50
Budget
Panasonic
91
Tamron
54
Landscape
Panasonic
86
Tamron
35
Travel
Panasonic
86
Tamron
45
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Tamron
28
Street
Panasonic
80
Tamron
34
Professional
Panasonic
80
Tamron
26
Portrait
Panasonic
77
Tamron
27
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Tamron
32

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmTamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min28 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm250 mm
Elements17—
Groups13—
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements4★—
CoatingFluorine coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/18
Min Aperture4-7.13.5-6.3
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountL-MountCanon AF
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.41 kg★0.42 kg
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus—
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★250 mm
Max Magnification0.5x1:3.5★

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (67th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average aperture (33rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports