Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
87 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm

Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm

Canon
47 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

75 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 MACRO O.I.S. lens is widely praised for its compact size, versatile zoom range, and macro capability, making it an ideal travel companion. Users appreciate the optical stabilization and the convenience of not swapping lenses, though some note softness at extreme ends and a slow aperture. Overall, it's a solid all-in-one solution for outdoor and travel photography.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile zoom range (28-200mm)
  • Macro capability
  • Effective optical stabilization
  • Convenient all-in-one travel lens
Cons
  • Soft at wide and telephoto ends
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Not ideal for low light without stabilization
  • Requires stopping down for sharpness
👍 Compactness 5
👍 Versatility 4
🤔 Image quality 4
👎 Aperture speed 4
👍 Stabilization 3
👍 Macro capability 2

Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm

45 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye Lens receives mixed feedback. One verified user reports a critical autofocus bug that requires a camera reset to fix, and incompatibility with Canon VR Utility for equirectangular conversion. Another verified owner finds it a good, affordable, lightweight alternative to the Canon R5 setup with autofocus. A third unverified user praises it for VR video, calling it a 10/10 purchase for wedding videography.

Pros
  • Affordable alternative to R5 setup
  • Lightweight design
  • Autofocus capability
  • Great for VR video
  • Good for wedding videography
Cons
  • Frequent autofocus loss requiring camera reset
  • Incompatible with Canon VR Utility
  • Limited compatibility (only R7 confirmed)
  • No screw-on ND filter options
  • Autofocus only on left lens subject
👎 Autofocus reliability 3
👎 Compatibility 3
👍 Value for money 2
👍 Vr video quality 2
👍 Build quality 1
👎 Filter options 2

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
96
Canon
63
Budget
Panasonic
90
Canon
48
Travel
Panasonic
87
Canon
44
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Canon
47
Landscape
Panasonic
86
Canon
40
Portrait
Panasonic
82
Canon
48
Professional
Panasonic
81
Canon
48
Street
Panasonic
80
Canon
61
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Canon
46

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmCanon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm
Optics
Typezoomfisheye
Focal Length Min28 mm4 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm4 mm
Elements1711
Groups138
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements4★2
CoatingFluorine coatingAir Sphere Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-7.1f/3.5
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountL-MountCanon RF
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.41 kg0.29 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm31 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★201 mm
Max Magnification0.5x1:33.33★

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm

  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

No current pricing available

Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 87 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider