TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm

TTArtisan
56 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

Viltrox
72 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
TTArtisan
55
Viltrox
79
Portrait
TTArtisan
64
Viltrox
70
Street
TTArtisan
48
Viltrox
61
Budget
TTArtisan
49
Viltrox
60
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
54
Viltrox
58
Professional
TTArtisan
44
Viltrox
51
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
33
Viltrox
47
Travel
TTArtisan
32
Viltrox
39
Landscape
TTArtisan
25
Viltrox
39

Specifications

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mmViltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
Optics
Typeprime—
Focal Length Min35 mm40 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm40 mm
Elements710
Groups66
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.4f/2.5
Min Aperturef/1.4—
Constant✓★—
Diaphragm Blades10★—
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-C★—
Weight0.31 kg★0.40 kg
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focusAutofocus
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm40 mm★

Pros & Cons

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 15 specs.

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports