Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
77 Overall Score
vs
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II 300mm

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II 300mm

OM System
46 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Nikon
82
OM System
48
Budget
Nikon
78
OM System
50
Video Cinema
Nikon
75
OM System
39
Portrait
Nikon
73
OM System
33
Professional
Nikon
69
OM System
41
Street
Nikon
67
OM System
46
Landscape
Nikon
62
OM System
52
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
55
OM System
41
Travel
Nikon
55
OM System
49

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VROM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II 300mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm75 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements1718
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements23★
CoatingNano Crystal CoatZERO coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperturef/44.8-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon FMicro Four Thirds
Formatfull-frame★micro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.68 kg0.42 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave MotorMSC
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops2.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm★900 mm
Max Magnification1:41:5.56

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong macro (74th percentile)

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II 300mm

  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average social proof (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Scores 77 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports