Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm

Sony
76 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm

No customer feedback yet

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Macro
Sony
67
Tamron
91
Budget
Sony
76
Tamron
91
Landscape
Sony
90
Tamron
86
Portrait
Sony
52
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Sony
79
Tamron
85
Professional
Sony
80
Tamron
84
Video Cinema
Sony
77
Tamron
82
Street
Sony
69
Tamron
81
Travel
Sony
80
Tamron
81

Specifications

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements1320
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements5★3
ED Elements22
CoatingFluorine Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/44-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.35 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeXD Linear MotorsVXD linear motor
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance240 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.19x1:2.8★

Pros & Cons

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm Better at:

Landscape

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports