Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
80 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 -A VC VXD 300mm

Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 -A VC VXD 300mm

Tamron
56 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Canon
89
Tamron
41
Budget
Canon
80
Tamron
43
Professional
Canon
80
Tamron
53
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Tamron
47
Video Cinema
Canon
75
Tamron
54
Macro
Canon
65
Tamron
73
Travel
Canon
73
Tamron
36
Portrait
Canon
54
Tamron
67
Street
Canon
64
Tamron
54

Specifications

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USMTamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 -A VC VXD 300mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min15 mm300 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements1619
Groups125
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingAir-Sphere coating, Fluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.8f/22
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountCanon RFCanon RF
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.84 kg0.64 kg
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeNano USMAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm150 mm
Max Magnification0.21x1:2

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 -A VC VXD 300mm

  • Strong macro (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Scores 80 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 -A VC VXD 300mm Better at:

MacroPortrait